Makes › Fiat › Qubo

Fiat Qubo reliability

D · Below average

MOT pass rates and common problems from 30,313 MOT tests of cars first registered 2009–2015.

64.7%pass first time
−5.2 ptsvs typical car
Beats 23%of cars
30,313MOT tests

Verdict

The Fiat Qubo passes its MOT first time on 64.7% of tests, 5.2 points lower than a typical car of the same age and mileage (69.8%). That puts it ahead of 23% of cars on UK roads once age and mileage are taken into account.

By year of first registration, the 2009 Qubo does best (beats 40% of cars) and the 2015 worst (beats 2%).

Better than average on lights & electrics, brakes.

Watch these weak spots

Suspension1.8×as often as a typical car
Tyres1.3×as often as a typical car
Coil springs2.5×as often as a typical car
Shock absorbers4.7×as often as a typical car

MOT pass rate by age

First-time pass rate at each MOT by the car’s age in years.

50%60%70%80%90%5678910111213141572%68%64%64%61%59%
Fiat QuboTypical car, same age & mileage

Best and worst years

By year of first registration, ranked against all cars on UK roads after adjusting for age and mileage. Green = better than half of cars.

2009
Beats 40%
2010
Beats 30%
2011
Beats 33%
2012
Beats 20%
2013
Beats 11%
2014
Beats 7%
2015
Beats 2%

Engines

All years, most common first. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

EngineYearsTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel2009–201527,48965.0%Beats 24%D
1.4 Petrol2010–20122,82461.2%Beats 16%E

Where it fails

Each area compared with a typical car of the same age and mileage, in points of pass rate. Tap or hover an area to see what to check.

Exhaust: 3.6% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Suspension: 17.6% of tests fail on suspension, against 9.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Lights: 9.4% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 12.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Tyres: 8.2% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Brakes: 4.8% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Lights: 9.4% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 12.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights+2.7 ptsTyres: 8.2% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres−1.9 ptsBrakes: 4.8% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes+1.6 ptsSuspension: 17.6% of tests fail on suspension, against 9.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension−7.9 ptsExhaust: 3.6% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust−1.0 ptsSuspension: 17.6% of tests fail on suspension, against 9.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Brakes: 4.8% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Tyres: 8.2% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Lights: 9.4% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 12.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Exhaust: 3.6% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Lights: 9.4% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 12.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights+2.7 ptsTyres: 8.2% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres−1.9 ptsBrakes: 4.8% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes+1.6 ptsSuspension: 17.6% of tests fail on suspension, against 9.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension−7.9 ptsExhaust: 3.6% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust−1.0 pts
Better than typicalTypicalWorse than typical
Suspension: 17.6% of tests fail on suspension, against 9.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.

Every MOT area

Share of tests failing on each area, against a typical car of the same age and mileage (black line).

Suspension
17.6% vs 9.7%
Lights & electrics
9.4% vs 12.1%
Tyres
8.2% vs 6.2%
Visibility
5.1% vs 4.8%
Brakes
4.8% vs 6.4%
Emissions & leaks
3.6% vs 2.6%
Body & structure
3.5% vs 3.0%
Steering
2.2% vs 1.7%
Seat belts & airbags
1.4% vs 0.7%
Wheels
0.2% vs 0.3%

Buying one or MOT due? Check these

  • Coil springs 2.5× typical
    Look behind each wheel for a snapped coil (often the bottom one) and listen for clunks over bumps.
  • Shock absorbers 4.7× typical
    Push down hard on each corner: it should rebound once and settle. Look for oily dampers.
  • Tyre damage & cracking 1.4× typical
    Look for cuts, bulges and cracking on both sidewalls of every tyre.
  • Tyre tread depth
    Check every tyre, including the inner edge, has at least 3 mm of tread. Uneven wear can point to alignment or suspension problems.
  • Windscreen wipers
    Test the washers and wipers: a cheap fix, but a very common MOT fail.
  • Headlight aim
    Park facing a wall at night: both dipped beams should sit level and dip to the left.

Pass rate by mileage

First-time pass rate by mileage at the test.

50%60%70%80%90%10k20k30k40k50k60k70k80k90k100k77%73%66%60%59%
Fiat QuboTypical car

Most common MOT failures

ItemThis carTypicalvs typical
Coil springs8.1%3.2%2.5×
Shock absorbers5.4%1.2%4.7×
Tyre damage & cracking5.1%3.5%1.4×
Tyre tread depth3.0%2.5%1.2×
Windscreen wipers2.6%2.2%1.2×
Headlight aim2.5%3.1%0.8×
Sidelights2.2%2.9%0.8×
Windscreen washers1.9%2.2%0.9×
Brake lights1.7%2.4%0.7×
Indicators1.5%0.8%1.9×

Specific defects found

Tester wording for the most frequent failure items, per 1,000 tests.

Defectper 1,000
A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened80.4
A shock absorber bush excessively worn 39.9
A tyre cords visible or damaged31.5
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements29.9
A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn26.2
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements25.1
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen21.4
A tyre seriously damaged19.3
Check another car

Pick a make and model to see its MOT pass rate, best and worst years and weak spots.

Every year and engine

Tap a year to see its engines. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

2015 Fiat Qubo1 engine72.0% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel1,20272.0%Beats 2%E
2014 Fiat Qubo1 engine70.4% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel2,32670.4%Beats 7%E
2013 Fiat Qubo1 engine66.6% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel4,64666.6%Beats 11%E
2012 Fiat Qubo2 engines65.7% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel6,68665.5%Beats 20%D
1.4 Petrol1,14366.8%Beats 15%E
2011 Fiat Qubo1 engine65.6% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel5,01265.6%Beats 33%D
2010 Fiat Qubo2 engines60.7% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel4,00062.2%Beats 37%D
1.4 Petrol1,68157.3%Beats 16%E
2009 Fiat Qubo1 engine58.8% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Diesel3,61758.8%Beats 40%D

FAQ

What is the Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate?

64.7% of MOT tests on the Fiat Qubo were passed first time, based on 30,313 tests between 2018 and 2026 of cars first registered 2009–2015. A typical car of the same age and mileage passes 69.8% of the time.

Is the Fiat Qubo reliable?

On MOT results it rates D (below average): it passes first time less often than a typical car of the same age and mileage and does better than 23% of cars on UK roads. MOT results cover safety and emissions items, not every kind of breakdown.

Which Fiat Qubo year is best?

Among years with enough data, the 2009 Qubo does best for its age and mileage: it beats 40% of cars on UK roads. The 2015 does worst: it beats 2%.

What are the most common MOT failures on the Fiat Qubo?

The most common failure items are coil springs, shock absorbers, tyre damage & cracking. Compared with similar cars, coil springs comes up 2.5× as often.

How we calculate this. We use official MOT results for cars tested in Great Britain from 2018 to 2026. Each car is compared with typical cars of the same age and mileage, so old and new cars are judged fairly; “pts” are percentage points above or below them. Differences also reflect how cars are used and maintained, not only how they are built.