Makes › Honda › FR-V

Honda FR-V reliability

C · Average

MOT pass rates and common problems from 77,710 MOT tests of cars first registered 2004–2009.

57.3%pass first time
+2.5 ptsvs typical car
Beats 60%of cars
77,710MOT tests

Verdict

The Honda FR-V passes its MOT first time on 57.3% of tests, 2.5 points higher than a typical car of the same age and mileage (54.7%). That puts it ahead of 60% of cars on UK roads once age and mileage are taken into account.

By year of first registration, the 2009 FR-V does best (beats 68% of cars) and the 2005 worst (beats 52%).

Of its engines, the 1.8 Petrol does best (beats 67%) and the 2.2 Diesel worst (beats 60%).

Better than average on body & structure, emissions & leaks, steering.

Watch these weak spots

Anti-roll bar links3.2×as often as a typical car
Component mounting prescribed areas3.1×as often as a typical car
Brake pads1.9×as often as a typical car
Brake performance1.5×as often as a typical car

MOT pass rate by age

First-time pass rate at each MOT by the car’s age in years.

40%50%60%70%80%9101112131415161718192068%63%58%56%54%52%
Honda FR-VTypical car, same age & mileage

Best and worst years

By year of first registration, ranked against all cars on UK roads after adjusting for age and mileage. Green = better than half of cars.

2004
Beats 52%
2005
Beats 52%
2006
Beats 55%
2007
Beats 64%
2008
Beats 61%
2009
Beats 68%

Engines

All years, most common first. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

EngineYearsTestsPass rateRankGrade
2.2 Diesel2005–200932,13956.7%Beats 60%C
1.8 Petrol2007–200924,45261.9%Beats 67%B
2.0 Petrol2004–200716,54752.5%Beats 50%C
1.7 Petrol2005–20064,57253.8%Beats 54%C

Where it fails

Each area compared with a typical car of the same age and mileage, in points of pass rate. Tap or hover an area to see what to check.

Exhaust: 5.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Suspension: 17.5% of tests fail on suspension, against 18.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Lights: 19.8% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 22.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Tyres: 9.4% of tests fail on tyres, against 8.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Brakes: 11.2% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Lights: 19.8% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 22.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights+2.5 ptsTyres: 9.4% of tests fail on tyres, against 8.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres−1.0 ptsBrakes: 11.2% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes+1.9 ptsSuspension: 17.5% of tests fail on suspension, against 18.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension+0.8 ptsExhaust: 5.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust+1.6 ptsSuspension: 17.5% of tests fail on suspension, against 18.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Brakes: 11.2% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Tyres: 9.4% of tests fail on tyres, against 8.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Lights: 19.8% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 22.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Exhaust: 5.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Lights: 19.8% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 22.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights+2.5 ptsTyres: 9.4% of tests fail on tyres, against 8.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres−1.0 ptsBrakes: 11.2% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.1% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes+1.9 ptsSuspension: 17.5% of tests fail on suspension, against 18.3% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension+0.8 ptsExhaust: 5.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust+1.6 pts
Better than typicalTypicalWorse than typical
Tyres: 9.4% of tests fail on tyres, against 8.4% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.

Every MOT area

Share of tests failing on each area, against a typical car of the same age and mileage (black line).

Lights & electrics
19.8% vs 22.3%
Suspension
17.5% vs 18.3%
Brakes
11.2% vs 13.1%
Tyres
9.4% vs 8.4%
Visibility
7.4% vs 7.2%
Body & structure
5.4% vs 7.7%
Emissions & leaks
5.0% vs 6.6%
Seat belts & airbags
2.2% vs 2.4%
Steering
1.4% vs 3.8%
Wheels
0.7% vs 0.6%

Buying one or MOT due? Check these

  • Anti-roll bar links 3.2× typical
    A knock or rattle over uneven roads usually means worn anti-roll bar links (cheap to fix).
  • Brake pads 1.9× typical
    Ask when the pads were last replaced and look for a brake-wear warning on the dash.
  • Brake performance 1.5× typical
    On the test drive, brake firmly: the car should stop straight with no pulsing through the pedal.
  • Sidelights
    Walk around with the lights on: bulb failures are the easiest MOT fails to avoid.
  • Tyre damage & cracking
    Look for cuts, bulges and cracking on both sidewalls of every tyre.
  • Headlight aim
    Park facing a wall at night: both dipped beams should sit level and dip to the left.

Pass rate by mileage

First-time pass rate by mileage at the test.

40%50%60%70%80%40k50k60k70k80k90k100k110k120k130k140k150k76%71%64%57%54%51%
Honda FR-VTypical car

Most common MOT failures

ItemThis carTypicalvs typical
Sidelights8.1%6.4%1.3×
Anti-roll bar links5.4%1.7%3.2×
Tyre damage & cracking5.4%4.2%1.3×
Brake pads4.6%2.5%1.9×
Component mounting prescribed areas4.4%1.4%3.1×
Headlight aim4.1%5.9%0.7×
Windscreen wipers4.0%2.9%1.4×
Tyre tread depth3.9%3.9%1.0×
Brake lights3.6%4.5%0.8×
Headlight bulbs & units3.3%4.3%0.8×

Specific defects found

Tester wording for the most frequent failure items, per 1,000 tests.

Defectper 1,000
A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn90.9
A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning67.2
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired44.5
A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm43.4
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements41.2
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen39.2
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements38.9
Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning34.2
Check another car

Pick a make and model to see its MOT pass rate, best and worst years and weak spots.

Every year and engine

Tap a year to see its engines. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

2009 Honda FR-V2 engines63.4% passB
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.8 Petrol6,44065.6%Beats 72%B
2.2 Diesel4,54460.3%Beats 62%B
2008 Honda FR-V2 engines59.1% passB
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.8 Petrol8,82460.7%Beats 63%B
2.2 Diesel7,46257.3%Beats 59%C
2007 Honda FR-V3 engines59.2% passB
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.8 Petrol9,18860.6%Beats 66%B
2.2 Diesel6,80057.3%Beats 61%B
2.0 Petrol1,06159.0%Beats 63%B
2006 Honda FR-V3 engines54.3% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
2.2 Diesel10,06754.9%Beats 59%C
2.0 Petrol5,57153.4%Beats 49%C
1.7 Petrol1,80453.7%Beats 50%C
2005 Honda FR-V3 engines52.5% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
2.0 Petrol8,46951.4%Beats 47%C
2.2 Diesel3,26654.3%Beats 60%C
1.7 Petrol2,76853.9%Beats 56%C
2004 Honda FR-V1 engine51.5% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
2.0 Petrol1,44651.5%Beats 52%C

FAQ

What is the Honda FR-V MOT pass rate?

57.3% of MOT tests on the Honda FR-V were passed first time, based on 77,710 tests between 2018 and 2026 of cars first registered 2004–2009. A typical car of the same age and mileage passes 54.7% of the time.

Is the Honda FR-V reliable?

On MOT results it rates C (average): it passes first time more often than a typical car of the same age and mileage and does better than 60% of cars on UK roads. MOT results cover safety and emissions items, not every kind of breakdown.

Which Honda FR-V year is best?

Among years with enough data, the 2009 FR-V does best for its age and mileage: it beats 68% of cars on UK roads. The 2005 does worst: it beats 52%.

Which Honda FR-V engine is best?

Across all years, the 1.8 Petrol does best: it beats 67% of cars on UK roads. The 2.2 Diesel does worst: it beats 60%.

What are the most common MOT failures on the Honda FR-V?

The most common failure items are sidelights, anti-roll bar links, tyre damage & cracking. Compared with similar cars, anti-roll bar links comes up 3.2× as often.

How we calculate this. We use official MOT results for cars tested in Great Britain from 2018 to 2026. Each car is compared with typical cars of the same age and mileage, so old and new cars are judged fairly; “pts” are percentage points above or below them. Differences also reflect how cars are used and maintained, not only how they are built.