Makes › Mitsubishi › Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star reliability

E · Poor

MOT pass rates and common problems from 21,787 MOT tests of cars first registered 2002–2005.

44.9%pass first time
−10.7 ptsvs typical car
Beats 15%of cars
21,787MOT tests

Verdict

The Mitsubishi Space Star passes its MOT first time on 44.9% of tests, 10.7 points lower than a typical car of the same age and mileage (55.6%). That puts it ahead of 15% of cars on UK roads once age and mileage are taken into account.

By year of first registration, the 2003 Space Star does best (beats 16% of cars) and the 2005 worst (beats 14%).

Of its engines, the 1.9 Diesel does best (beats 18%) and the 1.3 Petrol worst (beats 14%).

Watch these weak spots

Suspension1.6×as often as a typical car
Brakes1.7×as often as a typical car
Component mounting prescribed areas4.5×as often as a typical car
Drive shaft (CV) joints2.8×as often as a typical car

MOT pass rate by age

First-time pass rate at each MOT by the car’s age in years.

40%45%50%55%60%65%1415161718192044%45%44%43%45%45%44%
Mitsubishi Space StarTypical car, same age & mileage

Best and worst years

By year of first registration, ranked against all cars on UK roads after adjusting for age and mileage. Green = better than half of cars.

2002
Beats 15%
2003
Beats 16%
2004
Beats 15%
2005
Beats 14%

Engines

All years, most common first. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

EngineYearsTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.6 Petrol2002–200511,87545.4%Beats 14%E
1.3 Petrol2002–20055,49445.5%Beats 14%E
1.9 Diesel2003–20044,41842.8%Beats 18%E

Where it fails

Each area compared with a typical car of the same age and mileage, in points of pass rate. Tap or hover an area to see what to check.

Exhaust: 8.3% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.9% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Suspension: 27.2% of tests fail on suspension, against 16.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Lights: 24.2% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 21.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Tyres: 9.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 7.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Brakes: 23.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Lights: 24.2% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 21.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights−2.5 ptsTyres: 9.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 7.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres−2.2 ptsBrakes: 23.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes−9.9 ptsSuspension: 27.2% of tests fail on suspension, against 16.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension−10.6 ptsExhaust: 8.3% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.9% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust−1.5 ptsSuspension: 27.2% of tests fail on suspension, against 16.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Brakes: 23.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Tyres: 9.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 7.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Lights: 24.2% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 21.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Exhaust: 8.3% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.9% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Lights: 24.2% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 21.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights−2.5 ptsTyres: 9.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 7.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres−2.2 ptsBrakes: 23.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 13.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes−9.9 ptsSuspension: 27.2% of tests fail on suspension, against 16.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension−10.6 ptsExhaust: 8.3% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 6.9% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust−1.5 pts
Better than typicalTypicalWorse than typical
Suspension: 27.2% of tests fail on suspension, against 16.7% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.

Every MOT area

Share of tests failing on each area, against a typical car of the same age and mileage (black line).

Suspension
27.2% vs 16.7%
Lights & electrics
24.2% vs 21.7%
Brakes
23.6% vs 13.6%
Body & structure
14.4% vs 8.0%
Tyres
9.5% vs 7.2%
Visibility
8.8% vs 8.1%
Emissions & leaks
8.3% vs 6.9%
Steering
7.7% vs 4.0%
Seat belts & airbags
2.8% vs 2.9%
Wheels
0.3% vs 0.4%

Buying one or MOT due? Check these

  • Handbrake performance 2.6× typical
    Check the handbrake holds the car firmly on a slope.
  • Headlight bulbs & units 1.7× typical
    Check dipped and main beam on both sides.
  • Brake pads 2.3× typical
    Ask when the pads were last replaced and look for a brake-wear warning on the dash.
  • Engine warning light 1.8× typical
    The engine warning light should come on with the ignition and go out once the engine starts. If it stays on, get the fault codes read before you buy.
  • Track rod ends 1.9× typical
    Feel for play or knocking in the steering and check for wear on the inner edges of the front tyres.
  • Windscreen wipers 1.5× typical
    Test the washers and wipers: a cheap fix, but a very common MOT fail.

Pass rate by mileage

First-time pass rate by mileage at the test.

30%40%50%60%70%40k50k60k70k80k90k100k110k120k56%51%48%45%41%41%39%39%40%
Mitsubishi Space StarTypical car

Most common MOT failures

ItemThis carTypicalvs typical
Component mounting prescribed areas9.4%2.1%4.5×
Drive shaft (CV) joints7.8%2.8%2.8×
Headlight aim7.7%5.9%1.3×
Handbrake performance7.6%2.9%2.6×
Headlight bulbs & units6.8%4.1%1.7×
Brake pipes6.1%3.0%2.0×
Windscreen wipers5.6%3.8%1.5×
Tyre damage & cracking4.9%3.5%1.4×
Sidelights4.7%4.8%1.0×
Engine warning light4.5%2.5%1.8×

Specific defects found

Tester wording for the most frequent failure items, per 1,000 tests.

Defectper 1,000
The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired91.5
A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn89.3
A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc79.7
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements77.4
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded56.6
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement55.2
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen55.2
Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction47.1
Check another car

Pick a make and model to see its MOT pass rate, best and worst years and weak spots.

Every year and engine

Tap a year to see its engines. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

2005 Mitsubishi Space Star2 engines46.7% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.6 Petrol2,71547.2%Beats 14%E
1.3 Petrol1,15845.6%Beats 12%E
2004 Mitsubishi Space Star3 engines44.6% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.6 Petrol3,84145.0%Beats 14%E
1.9 Diesel2,44643.2%Beats 18%E
1.3 Petrol2,08645.6%Beats 14%E
2003 Mitsubishi Space Star3 engines44.2% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.6 Petrol2,85645.1%Beats 15%E
1.9 Diesel1,97242.4%Beats 18%E
1.3 Petrol1,21644.7%Beats 13%E
2002 Mitsubishi Space Star2 engines44.8% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.6 Petrol2,46344.2%Beats 14%E
1.3 Petrol1,03446.1%Beats 16%E

FAQ

What is the Mitsubishi Space Star MOT pass rate?

44.9% of MOT tests on the Mitsubishi Space Star were passed first time, based on 21,787 tests between 2018 and 2026 of cars first registered 2002–2005. A typical car of the same age and mileage passes 55.6% of the time.

Is the Mitsubishi Space Star reliable?

On MOT results it rates E (poor): it passes first time less often than a typical car of the same age and mileage and does better than 15% of cars on UK roads. MOT results cover safety and emissions items, not every kind of breakdown.

Which Mitsubishi Space Star year is best?

Among years with enough data, the 2003 Space Star does best for its age and mileage: it beats 16% of cars on UK roads. The 2005 does worst: it beats 14%.

Which Mitsubishi Space Star engine is best?

Across all years, the 1.9 Diesel does best: it beats 18% of cars on UK roads. The 1.3 Petrol does worst: it beats 14%.

What are the most common MOT failures on the Mitsubishi Space Star?

The most common failure items are component mounting prescribed areas, drive shaft (CV) joints, headlight aim. Compared with similar cars, component mounting prescribed areas comes up 4.5× as often.

How we calculate this. We use official MOT results for cars tested in Great Britain from 2018 to 2026. Each car is compared with typical cars of the same age and mileage, so old and new cars are judged fairly; “pts” are percentage points above or below them. Differences also reflect how cars are used and maintained, not only how they are built.