Makes › Suzuki › Swift

Suzuki Swift reliability

C · Average

MOT pass rates and common problems from 1.1 million MOT tests of cars first registered 2001–2023.

Suzuki Swift
71.2%pass first time
−1.6 ptsvs typical car
Beats 40%of cars
1.1MMOT tests

Verdict

The Suzuki Swift passes its MOT first time on 71.2% of tests, 1.6 points lower than a typical car of the same age and mileage (72.8%). That puts it ahead of 40% of cars on UK roads once age and mileage are taken into account.

By year of first registration, the 2020 Swift does best (beats 71% of cars) and the 2008 worst (beats 24%).

Of its engines, the 1.2 Hybrid does best (beats 75%) and the 1.3 Petrol worst (beats 24%).

Better than average on emissions & leaks, body & structure, steering.

Watch these weak spots

Brakes1.6×as often as a typical car
Visibility1.3×as often as a typical car
Sidelights1.8×as often as a typical car
Brake pipes3.5×as often as a typical car

MOT pass rate by age

First-time pass rate at each MOT by the car’s age in years.

40%60%80%100%3456789101112131415161718192090%85%80%72%64%57%53%51%51%
Suzuki SwiftTypical car, same age & mileage

Best and worst years

By year of first registration, ranked against all cars on UK roads after adjusting for age and mileage. Green = better than half of cars.

2001
Beats 19%
2002
Beats 15%
2003
Beats 17%
2005
Beats 25%
2006
Beats 26%
2007
Beats 26%
2008
Beats 24%
2009
Beats 25%
2010
Beats 30%
2011
Beats 48%
2012
Beats 56%
2013
Beats 56%
2014
Beats 54%
2015
Beats 54%
2016
Beats 47%
2017
Beats 52%
2018
Beats 55%
2019
Beats 63%
2020
Beats 71%
2021
Beats 71%
2022
Beats 88%
2023
Beats 97%

Engines

All years, most common first. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

EngineYearsTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol2010–2020507,59976.8%Beats 53%C
1.5 Petrol2005–2010144,01753.8%Beats 26%D
1.3 Petrol2005–2011143,64054.1%Beats 24%D
1.6 Petrol2006–201781,89368.9%Beats 43%C
1.0 Petrol2001–202073,98482.2%Beats 41%C
1.2 Hybrid2017–202360,96190.4%Beats 75%B
1.0 Hybrid2017–201927,85586.9%Beats 70%B
1.2 Diesel2006–201426,92457.6%Beats 25%D
1.4 Petrol2018–201912,19988.0%Beats 72%B
1.4 Hybrid2020–20224,83590.2%Beats 68%B

Where it fails

Each area compared with a typical car of the same age and mileage, in points of pass rate. Tap or hover an area to see what to check.

Exhaust: 2.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Suspension: 9.0% of tests fail on suspension, against 8.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Lights: 12.0% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 10.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Tyres: 5.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Brakes: 9.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Lights: 12.0% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 10.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights−1.5 ptsTyres: 5.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres+0.6 ptsBrakes: 9.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes−3.6 ptsSuspension: 9.0% of tests fail on suspension, against 8.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension−0.8 ptsExhaust: 2.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust+0.6 ptsSuspension: 9.0% of tests fail on suspension, against 8.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Brakes: 9.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Tyres: 5.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Lights: 12.0% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 10.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Exhaust: 2.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Lights: 12.0% of tests fail on lights & electrics, against 10.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Walk round the car with every light on, including brake, fog and number plate lights.Lights−1.5 ptsTyres: 5.5% of tests fail on tyres, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Check the tread on every tyre, including the inner edge, and look for cuts or bulges.Tyres+0.6 ptsBrakes: 9.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.Brakes−3.6 ptsSuspension: 9.0% of tests fail on suspension, against 8.2% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for knocks over speed bumps and push each corner down: it should settle at once.Suspension−0.8 ptsExhaust: 2.0% of tests fail on emissions & leaks, against 2.6% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Listen for a blowing exhaust at start-up and look underneath for oil or fluid leaks.Exhaust+0.6 pts
Better than typicalTypicalWorse than typical
Brakes: 9.6% of tests fail on brakes, against 6.0% for a typical car of the same age and mileage. Brake firmly on the test drive: the car should stop straight with no pulsing or grinding.

Every MOT area

Share of tests failing on each area, against a typical car of the same age and mileage (black line).

Lights & electrics
12.0% vs 10.6%
Brakes
9.6% vs 6.0%
Suspension
9.0% vs 8.2%
Visibility
6.0% vs 4.6%
Tyres
5.5% vs 6.0%
Emissions & leaks
2.0% vs 2.6%
Body & structure
1.8% vs 2.9%
Seat belts & airbags
0.7% vs 0.8%
Steering
0.5% vs 1.5%
Wheels
0.2% vs 0.3%

Buying one or MOT due? Check these

  • Sidelights 1.8× typical
    Walk around with the lights on: bulb failures are the easiest MOT fails to avoid.
  • Windscreen wipers 1.6× typical
    Test the washers and wipers: a cheap fix, but a very common MOT fail.
  • Handbrake performance 2.2× typical
    Check the handbrake holds the car firmly on a slope.
  • Brake performance 2.1× typical
    On the test drive, brake firmly: the car should stop straight with no pulsing through the pedal.
  • Suspension ball joints 1.8× typical
    Listen for knocks over speed bumps and feel for wandering or vague steering.
  • Tyre tread depth
    Check every tyre, including the inner edge, has at least 3 mm of tread. Uneven wear can point to alignment or suspension problems.

Pass rate by mileage

First-time pass rate by mileage at the test.

40%60%80%100%0k10k20k30k40k50k60k70k80k90k100k110k120k130k140k150k93%86%77%66%57%51%49%48%
Suzuki SwiftTypical car

Most common MOT failures

ItemThis carTypicalvs typical
Sidelights4.5%2.4%1.8×
Brake lights3.7%2.1%1.8×
Windscreen wipers3.7%2.3%1.6×
Tyre tread depth2.5%2.3%1.1×
Tyre damage & cracking2.5%3.4%0.7×
Headlight aim2.4%2.9%0.8×
Handbrake performance2.4%1.1%2.2×
Brake pipes2.3%0.7%3.5×
Brake performance2.3%1.1%2.1×
Suspension ball joints2.2%1.3%1.8×

Specific defects found

Tester wording for the most frequent failure items, per 1,000 tests.

Defectper 1,000
A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn44.2
A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning39.7
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen36.3
Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning35.5
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements24.8
The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements24.3
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded22.6
Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen21.0
Check another car

Pick a make and model to see its MOT pass rate, best and worst years and weak spots.

Every year and engine

Tap a year to see its engines. Grades compare each car with cars of the same age and mileage (A = best 20% of cars on UK roads, E = worst 20%), so an older or higher-mileage car can grade above one with a higher pass rate.

2023 Suzuki Swift1 engine94.0% passA
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Hybrid2,95994.0%Beats 97%A
2022 Suzuki Swift2 engines92.6% passA
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Hybrid6,94992.9%Beats 91%A
1.4 Hybrid1,66091.3%Beats 75%B
2021 Suzuki Swift2 engines90.6% passB
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Hybrid19,97090.6%Beats 72%B
1.4 Hybrid1,61989.9%Beats 63%B
2020 Suzuki Swift4 engines89.7% passB
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Hybrid25,19289.8%Beats 72%B
1.2 Petrol2,64788.4%Beats 57%C
1.4 Hybrid1,55689.4%Beats 68%B
1.0 Petrol1,05491.4%Beats 81%A
2019 Suzuki Swift5 engines87.8% passB
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol26,93287.1%Beats 58%C
1.0 Petrol11,44787.8%Beats 58%C
1.0 Hybrid7,47388.7%Beats 78%B
1.4 Petrol6,20588.8%Beats 75%B
1.2 Hybrid1,76488.8%Beats 75%B
2018 Suzuki Swift5 engines85.6% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.0 Petrol31,13485.0%Beats 47%C
1.0 Hybrid12,38186.6%Beats 66%B
1.2 Petrol7,39485.2%Beats 47%C
1.4 Petrol5,99487.2%Beats 70%B
1.2 Hybrid3,11486.3%Beats 64%B
2017 Suzuki Swift5 engines84.2% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.0 Petrol23,23384.2%Beats 48%C
1.2 Petrol20,77183.5%Beats 46%C
1.0 Hybrid8,00185.8%Beats 68%B
1.6 Petrol2,20583.3%Beats 50%C
1.2 Hybrid1,01387.6%Beats 80%A
2016 Suzuki Swift2 engines81.5% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol73,95681.4%Beats 45%C
1.6 Petrol8,81382.4%Beats 60%C
2015 Suzuki Swift2 engines80.4% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol97,82180.3%Beats 52%C
1.6 Petrol12,25781.0%Beats 62%B
2014 Suzuki Swift3 engines77.4% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol76,59877.6%Beats 54%C
1.6 Petrol10,65977.6%Beats 61%B
1.2 Diesel2,35467.9%Beats 17%E
2013 Suzuki Swift3 engines74.1% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol65,86974.2%Beats 55%C
1.6 Petrol9,18676.0%Beats 69%B
1.2 Diesel3,06166.9%Beats 30%D
2012 Suzuki Swift3 engines70.9% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol67,15571.4%Beats 57%C
1.6 Petrol8,48371.7%Beats 62%B
1.2 Diesel5,34463.0%Beats 28%D
2011 Suzuki Swift4 engines66.6% passC
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.2 Petrol47,13068.1%Beats 55%C
1.3 Petrol3,80057.6%Beats 12%E
1.6 Petrol3,24057.5%Beats 13%E
1.2 Diesel2,24263.6%Beats 43%C
2010 Suzuki Swift5 engines60.2% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.3 Petrol24,57758.3%Beats 23%D
1.2 Petrol21,32663.0%Beats 43%C
1.5 Petrol5,27463.2%Beats 31%D
1.6 Petrol2,94555.2%Beats 17%E
1.2 Diesel2,77955.5%Beats 26%D
2009 Suzuki Swift4 engines56.3% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.3 Petrol29,83956.3%Beats 25%D
1.5 Petrol28,26057.2%Beats 26%D
1.6 Petrol5,57555.0%Beats 26%D
1.2 Diesel4,07551.5%Beats 19%E
2008 Suzuki Swift4 engines53.2% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.5 Petrol36,48353.6%Beats 25%D
1.3 Petrol28,96453.3%Beats 24%D
1.6 Petrol7,67452.0%Beats 25%D
1.2 Diesel3,32450.7%Beats 26%D
2007 Suzuki Swift4 engines52.5% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.5 Petrol37,40053.4%Beats 27%D
1.3 Petrol31,39552.4%Beats 26%D
1.6 Petrol8,78250.4%Beats 26%D
1.2 Diesel1,60447.1%Beats 19%E
2006 Suzuki Swift4 engines50.3% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.5 Petrol27,94650.5%Beats 25%D
1.3 Petrol16,45850.4%Beats 26%D
1.2 Diesel2,14145.6%Beats 20%E
1.6 Petrol2,07452.1%Beats 39%D
2005 Suzuki Swift2 engines48.8% passD
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.5 Petrol8,65449.4%Beats 27%D
1.3 Petrol8,60748.3%Beats 24%D
2003 Suzuki Swift1 engine54.1% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.0 Petrol1,44254.1%Beats 17%E
2002 Suzuki Swift1 engine52.7% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.0 Petrol4,01252.7%Beats 15%E
2001 Suzuki Swift1 engine54.0% passE
EngineTestsPass rateRankGrade
1.0 Petrol1,66254.0%Beats 19%E

FAQ

What is the Suzuki Swift MOT pass rate?

71.2% of MOT tests on the Suzuki Swift were passed first time, based on 1,083,907 tests between 2018 and 2026 of cars first registered 2001–2023. A typical car of the same age and mileage passes 72.8% of the time.

Is the Suzuki Swift reliable?

On MOT results it rates C (average): it passes first time less often than a typical car of the same age and mileage and does better than 40% of cars on UK roads. MOT results cover safety and emissions items, not every kind of breakdown.

Which Suzuki Swift year is best?

Among years with enough data, the 2020 Swift does best for its age and mileage: it beats 71% of cars on UK roads. The 2008 does worst: it beats 24%.

Which Suzuki Swift engine is best?

Across all years, the 1.2 Hybrid does best: it beats 75% of cars on UK roads. The 1.3 Petrol does worst: it beats 24%.

What are the most common MOT failures on the Suzuki Swift?

The most common failure items are sidelights, brake lights, windscreen wipers. Compared with similar cars, sidelights comes up 1.8× as often.

How we calculate this. We use official MOT results for cars tested in Great Britain from 2018 to 2026. Each car is compared with typical cars of the same age and mileage, so old and new cars are judged fairly; “pts” are percentage points above or below them. Differences also reflect how cars are used and maintained, not only how they are built.